For the love of Tom

Forced vaccinations on our loved ones

Let me preface this article by saying that the fact that the state and its institutions have, and are still, forcing human beings, whatever their age or health, into having medical procedures of any kind is morally reprehensible. 

Any suggestion that this is remotely acceptable, is merely setting a precedent for the darkest forces to decide what goes into your body. It goes against every written and unwritten ethical and moral code that underpins a humane society. 

This particular case is about a young man called Tom, but in essence it is about all of us. We are Tom, and Tom is us.

Tom is 22 years old, but he has the mental capacity of a child aged around 18 months. He is a very happy and loving young man. He enjoys being with animals, listening to music, looking at books, dancing and being out and about meeting people. Family is most important to him. He gives joy to all that meet him. He lives off love and is loved so very much.

Tom was born with a chromosome imbalance, partial Trisomy 13, which caused severe learning difficulties and a heart condition being Tetralogy of Fallot. He had full corrective heart surgery at the age of one. 

He takes no medications and is a fit and healthy, strong young man.

Getting to this age has exceeded the expectations of the medical profession, which is a credit to his mother. This is the family unit: Tom is the focus of her life and she is the focus of his. She has raised him with love and dedication.

Ironically, during the initial stages of the fear-mongering Shit Show, the NHS forgot about Tom. He was not placed on any priority list as a vulnerable person, which meant Tom’s mother received no ‘priority shopping’ and could not receive deliveries but had to rely on neighbours. There was also no phone call of concern or an offer of support from Social Services.

But, once the Covid-19 vaccination was available, Tom was called to receive it.

After detailed research of medical issues, Tom’s mother was extremely concerned about the vaccination and how it could impact on Tom’s good health, in particular his heart.  It is acknowledged in the Healthcare Guidance notes that Myocarditis (heart inflammation) is a side effect of the mRNA Covid-19 vaccination.  

As Tom has no speech, he would not be able to communicate symptoms to his mother, ‘mum my heart is racing, mum I can’t breath properly...’ His mother says she would have to live each day with ‘the not knowing of what could be happening to Tom’.

If the previous paragraph doesn’t make you burn with helpless, incandescent rage, then I don’t really know what to say.   

After the ‘vaccine’ rollout began in 2021, Tom’s mother refused to let the state vaccinate him, and in September 2022, Judge Burrows ruled in a county court that Tom must be vaccinated. There was an appeal which was subsequently denied. Tom’s case was then taken over by Justice Hayden who upheld the ruling. It is worth noting that a GP and a pharmacist both refused to inject Tom on principle, however another doctor has decided that it is in Tom’s ‘best interest’ to be vaccinated. This is a ‘vaccine’ that could cause him harm or kill him. The fact that he remains unvaccinated and still alive and well over four years after a deadly global pandemic, seems to have passed these people by.

Last week there was another hearing which I watched online. I noticed that there was a chat window open, and I wrote the following:

A few minutes later, a message appeared. The chat had suddenly been turned off. Had nobody noticed that it was turned ‘on’ at the start? 

Justice Hayden, the judge presiding at the virtual hearing appeared fully on board with the Covid narrative and despite the fact that the coercion of any medical procedure violates tenets of the Nuremberg Code, especially the doctor’s oath First Do No Harm, he found it strange that more ‘muscle’ hadn’t been used to carry out the ruling ie the vaccination.

Yes, you read that right: Muscle.

My blood pressure rose as it was revealed that at one point in 2022, at the start of the case, the medics were prepared to come to Tom’s home to carry out the vaccination. Please think about the implications of that: The state entering your home sets a clear precedent. Once you let them in, they could come back for any reason. 

As the hearing progressed, it became apparent that the lawyer representing the NHS was determined to bog the proceedings down with complex medical paperwork.

There was no inkling of any moral or ethical consideration here.

There was no concern for the divine soul of our friend Tom.

And, where was the jury of his peers?

I furiously tweeted my disgust at the increasing lunacy being played out. A few minutes later, the judge suddenly told everyone in the meeting that he’d been sent an email. He started to read that there had been tweets sent regarding the case. I heard my name. Then he read one of my tweets which included the phrase: 

The judiciary has been captured by Branch Covidian lunatics. 

And the hashtags: #FirstDoNoHarm #Nuremberg

Somebody had been monitoring twitter, whether that was part of the court process I have no idea, but I suddenly felt distinctly uneasy. Would I get a knock on the door for merely stating the moral case that it is evil to force another human being to have an injection? Could this really be Britain in 2024, or had I somehow travelled back in time to 1930s Germany? To say my blood ran cold is an understatement; it froze over in my veins, like the Danube in winter.

I could almost hear people whispering: ‘Ooh, that Abi Roberts, she’s well-meaning, but she does go a bit too far’. Would you say the same about those who challenged Stalin’s Soviet terror, those who refused to align with the Nazis, or those who stood in front of tanks on the streets of Czechoslovakia, or in Tiananmen Square? 

Remember, the worst kind of tyranny starts with ‘for the greater good’, and that tyranny perseveres because people start to shrug their shoulders and say ‘it’s too much trouble speaking out’. Let me assure you, it’ll be more fucking trouble when the authorities think they can come into your home and vaccinate you, or your loved ones.

An all too familiar surge of anger and sadness flowed through me which I find hard to describe. Why is this damn case happening at all? Why is it being normalised, even by those on our side? I closed my laptop and went for a walk. Despite being surrounded by the hum of human voices and birdsong; I felt very alone, and terrified for the future.

Then, through the fog of anxiety shone a tiny beam of light like a ship rising out of the gloom. I was told by fellow attendees that after the lunch break, Justice Hayden had come back and seemed to take a different tack. Apparently he suggested that people are questioning the pandemic regime more, and the climate has changed, so the reason for mandatory vaccination may no longer be there. The case would be starting from scratch – which makes me somewhat hopeful because with the passage of time, the original premise of the argument ‘let’s protect Tom and others from a deadly virus’ becomes more and more unsustainable as the millions of harms and deaths from these particular ‘vaccines’ unravels further across the globe.

By the way, rather than the overused phrase ‘mandatory vaccination’ I prefer to use the less cuddly term: State sanctioned injections. 

It’s not over though, not by a long shot. Tom’s courageous mother needs to raise money for the next round as, unbelievably, she is required to pay a third of the legal costs – please see the link at the bottom for the Crowd Justice page.

All of us need to look at this as a moral crusade. This isn’t a row with the council about cycle lanes, or a dispute with your neighbour about a boundary fence, this is the very worst excesses of state overreach.

Once again I implore you to read your damn history.

We are all Tom, and Tom is us. 

We are all Tom’s mother, and Tom’s mother is us.

We are all Justice Hayden, and Justice Hayden is us. 

What happens next will be on record, as will the part all of us play.

Let us pray to God Almighty that the ship’s light we glimpse coming through the mist gets ever brighter until it reaches the safe harbour of justice.

Be seeing you.

YOU CAN HELP TOM AND HIS MOTHER FIGHT THE STATE here