31 Comments

I too like to believe that a visit from a robin is a sign that a passed relative has come to see me. I often talk to them in the garden or in our cemetery.

Inspired by my mother-in-law I have just bought a small light up twig tree and decorated it with clip-on robins. I was going to put it out at Christmas but have decided to put it out now and call it my autumn tree.

Thank you for all the well wishes for Will. Mad world went down well.

Expand full comment

Love the sound of your robin decorated tree! It was always said in 'olden times' something about birds and the souls of our ancestors.

Expand full comment

Thanks Natalie. Can't take the credit, my mother-in-law did one for Xmas last year so have borrowed the idea. I am tempted just to have that as my tree this year. I have posted a picture of it on my substack if you are interested x

Expand full comment

👍

Expand full comment

With you on a lot of that final part, the waters are muddy enough without people being so strident only one way. There is more nuance out there than meets the eye. We are being pushed to jump one way or the other. All common ground is being pulled from under us, so many agitators around! I have started to withdraw a bit from some discussions, the vibes can be too negative for me. Anyway on that note, I’m off to see David Icke in Blackpool tomorrow night so will catch up with the pod on Thursday xx

Expand full comment

Roz, I will be interested to get your take on David Icke.

Expand full comment

Ditto. Wonder what he's driving these days...

Expand full comment

He was great and lo and behold he reiterated what I wrote above! He is great to listen to, it was very relaxed and he has a great sense of humour.

Expand full comment

👍

Expand full comment

Make Dot great again!

Expand full comment

MDGA 👵🏻😂

Expand full comment

😂

Expand full comment

Dear Lord, don’t get me started on that posturing wet week that is Douglas fucking Murray. What a tepid fart in the wind he turned out to be. People like him are captured sock puppets for the global parasites. Prancing about in his virtual gimp mask inside the Overton window pretending to be radical, all the while promoting the satanic agenda by what he doesn’t say. A sub-human skid mark. I’m not a fan

Expand full comment

“I’m not a fan” 😂

Expand full comment

Excellent summary 😃

Expand full comment

Haha

Expand full comment

Hi Abi. I’d never had a migraine… suddenly 5 years ago at 56 they appeared. Aura all the shit. Well, a work colleague who was plagued by them… she can’t shop in ASDA due to their lights, asked me if anything had changed in my life or diet?

No?

Then I said I’m not a coffee drinker but I’ve just put a machine in my office and I’m having 3/4 a day.

She said it’s the coffee!

No I thought, but I stop using it or having any filter coffee. The migraines disappeared! Coffee can be the devils brew

Expand full comment

I’m doing okay Abs thanks as hope you and everyone else is.

Great job Lisa and sending love.

❤️

Expand full comment

Make Dot a regular

Expand full comment

She’ll be back 😘

Expand full comment

Genius commentary of the lady discussing the consultants! 👏

Expand full comment

Yes, that was brilliant and made me laugh so much.

Expand full comment

Just had my Abi catch-up listen - Lovely!!! I sympathise regarding the migraines. as i get the full ones on occasion, well done you for getting on with it. Cheers to you all !!

Expand full comment

Iain Davis was making a very simple point in his discussion with Aisling. He was trying to engage with the truth by putting forward the objective evidence showing that the narrative about a bomb was false. He neither claimed that there were no victims nor treated the situation as if it were a game. He was admirably patient and measured. Isn’t establishing the truth the most respectful way to behave toward the victims? To help them discover what (and whom) really injured them? Is trying to establish truth ever morally wrong?

Expand full comment

Yes, as I have said previously, I find Iain Davis very measured. My issue is with the extreme idea that there are no victims and that their own testimony was false by default because, according to some in the awake movement ‘everything is false’. Also if it wasn’t a bomb of some kind, what might it have been? In a way the ‘bomb’ part is distracting. A bit like Covid virus v no Covid virus – the crimes happened regardless. Trying to establish truth is of course never morally wrong. I suppose it helps if it is accompanied by her trusty sisters goodness and beauty, with an understanding of human nature and the objective reality of that. Sometimes I don’t see that in the awake crowd. We are in the fight of our lives and we owe it to those who come next to focus on that, whilst always engaging in free and open debate.

Thanks Trevor as always for your keen eye and welcome contribution x

Expand full comment

It’s fair to be suspicious of these events, I have questions about the Manchester bombing for sure, there’s lots of red flags but real people do die in these ‘events’, some don’t. We need to check ourselves and our thinking constantly and try to stay rational. Many of the ‘awake’ crowd have lost their ability to think, let alone critically think, it’s a sad watch 🤷🏻‍♀️

Expand full comment

So true Jules x

Expand full comment

Thanks Abi

And a huge appreciation of all you do and have done. We are all picking our way across a minefield and trying to piece together a version of reality. It’s hard but also an exciting time of real insight and discovery. Truth freedom justice love and beauty are our guides. I like Owen Benjamin’s stance of “I might be wrong but at least I’m not lying” Perhaps I missed it but I have never heard anyone suggest there were no victims in Manchester. I certainly don’t believe that to be the case. If it was a false flag it doesn’t suggest there were no victims as I said earlier re 9/11 and 7/7. Aisling doesn’t seem capable of the thought experiment that asks “if there was no bomb then what injured those people?” She just seems to insist victim=bomb. It doesn’t seem like very critical thinking to me

Expand full comment

After listening to today’s pod, I listened again to the Davis interview on Aisling O’Loughlin’s Substack:

Aisling O’Loughlin came out horribly in this interview with Iain Davis. She was strident, emotionally stupid (not emotionally intelligent), and she used snobbery as a weapon in argumentation. I wanted to hear Davis’ out, but O’Loughlin constantly shouted across him and threw out a couple of times a particularly snobbish epithet, “sofa journalism”. Iain Davis and Richard D. Hall, for better or worse, are researchers who write books about current events; they do not refer to themselves as journalists.

I do take seriously Abi Robert’s insight that not every happening should be inverted away from its original manifestation; sometimes a cigar is a cigar. But, I’ll be the judge of that and after these last four years, neither journalist nor researcher is responsible for directing my attention.

Expand full comment

Well said ❤️🔥

Expand full comment

Abi, your take on Consultants really made me laugh, saving half a life😂 In my experience Consultants are arrogant bastards who try and play God, treating you just like a number and not a real person. Going private is a completely different experience of course, money talks.

People talking loudly on their phones in public places drives me insane. They are so self-centred with no thought for other people. In my experience this is people of all ages, male and female. Especially annoying on the train when I am trying to read my kindle! Btw your chicken impression sounded like a cockerel being strangled😂

I really liked Annie Lennox & Eurythmics in the day. Like so many, Annie Lennox was an advocate of the jabs and I believe that she is into the gender nonsense too.

Expand full comment